Cutting Your Biggest ILS Is Reversible. Try It Small First
You can cut your biggest ILS contract and occupancy will not fall off a cliff. It might not move at all. Nobody wants to say that out loud, because the contract is expensive, and expensive things feel load-bearing whether or not they're actually holding anything up.
Here's why the fear sticks around. Most operators have never tested it. You renewed last year because you renewed the year before, and the line item quietly became furniture. Nobody budgets time to find out what happens if it's gone, because the risk feels lopsided: it works, you saved some money, nobody claps. It doesn't, you're the one explaining a leasing dip to your boss. So the safe move is to keep paying and keep wondering.
That lopsided bet is fixable, and you don't need to risk the whole portfolio to fix it. Pick five to eight assets that look like the middle of your book: not your star, not your dud, nothing mid-lease-up messing with the read, similar market conditions to everything else. Pull the ILS off those assets for 60 to 90 days. Leave the rest running exactly as is.
Watch three things on the test set: lead volume by source, lead-to-tour rate, and where the replacement traffic shows up. If organic search, your Google Business Profile, or your own site quietly absorbs the loss, you've learned something real: that ILS wasn't generating demand, it was just standing in front of people who were coming anyway.
If tour volume drops and stays down past 45 days, that's your answer too, and it's a fine one. Flip it back on for that subset and move on. That's the whole point of testing small instead of testing everywhere: a bad result costs you a few units of pipeline for a quarter, not an occupancy problem you have to defend in front of ownership.
What I wouldn't do is cut the contract cold across the whole portfolio because a regional read a case study or a competing vendor dangled a discount.
That's not a decision. That's a hunch with a signature on it.
The entire value of testing small is turning "I think this ILS is dead weight" into a number you can actually defend in a budget meeting.
I also wouldn't run this test during your heaviest leasing window. If your portfolio leans student, or your markets get a hard spring surge, that's demand that would have shown up no matter what you did. Pick a shoulder period. You want a clean read, not one contaminated by a season doing the work for you.
One more thing before you touch the contract at all: check what your CRM already says about that source's lead-to-lease conversion, not just lead count. A site that floods you with volume and converts none of it is a different problem than a site that's quietly your best performer and you just never checked. Some vendors are happy to show you the first number and bury the second. Your own CRM data doesn't have a sales quota to hit.
If the small test says cut it, cut it in phases, not all at once. Pull it from another 20 percent of the portfolio next quarter, watch the same three metrics, keep going until the pattern breaks or you've fully exited. This isn't a light switch. It's closer to weaning the portfolio off a habit you're not sure it ever needed, and the only way to actually know is to watch what happens when it's gone somewhere small enough that being wrong won't hurt.
That's not a decision. That's a hunch with a signature on it.
A weekly for the people who run apartment marketing.
Get it Tuesdays