Latest · Budget

Marketing Spend Per Unit Benchmarks Are Lying to You

September 2, 2026

The industry benchmark for spend per unit is one of those numbers that sounds authoritative right up until you point it at an actual property.

Not because the math is broken. Because it takes a garden-style value-add deal in a secondary Texas market, blends it with a Class A high-rise lease-up in Denver, and hands you back one number that describes neither of them. It's an average of two different jobs.

Here's what actually moves spend per unit, and none of it survives being flattened into one blended figure.

Market saturation. How many other communities are running paid media in your submarket this month. Asset class, since Class A usually needs less discounting on lead volume and more spent on looking the part, while B and C often need raw lead flow to hit the same occupancy number. And portfolio size: a ten-property regional operator is never going to squeeze the same per-unit efficiency out of a CRM or call center that a national platform gets running hundreds of communities through the same stack.

Lease-up versus stabilized beats almost everything else on that list. A property filling up from zero needs months of expensive, sustained lead generation. A 95% occupied stabilized asset needs retention and whatever falls in organically, basically nothing else. Blend those two into a single "per unit" number and you've built a figure that fits no actual property on your list.

So a benchmark report lands in your inbox. Now what.

Use it as a smell test, not a scoreboard. If your spend per unit is way outside the range for your asset class and occupancy status, that's worth a look. It doesn't mean you're wrong. It means you should be able to explain the gap in one sentence to your VP, not disappear into a spreadsheet for a week.

Better move: build your own benchmark. Track spend per unit by property, split by lease-up status, asset class, and submarket, across your own portfolio, for at least four quarters. That comparison beats any published number for one simple reason: every property in it lives with the same reporting quirks, the same CRM, the same attribution guesswork. At least you know what you're comparing.

Here's the thing I wouldn't do: walk into a budget conversation with an industry average as your defense. If a regional or an owner asks why your spend per unit is higher than "the benchmark," the honest answer almost always lives in your market, not in the average. Lean on a number whose methodology you can't even see, and you're one follow-up question away from looking exposed.

The other thing I wouldn't do is chase the benchmark down. A report says operators are spending less per unit this quarter, your board wants your number to match, so the temptation is to cut spend on a lease-up asset to hit a portfolio-wide average. Resist it. Occupancy problems compound. A stalled lease-up will cost you far more in lost rent than you'll ever save chasing a number that was never calculated with your property in mind.

The real skill isn't memorizing the benchmark.

It's knowing which of your properties should sit above it, which should sit below it, and being able to say why without reaching for an industry report to do your talking for you.

Source: